33
There is a history of EIS investment in
this sector – through British Marine plc,
a UK owned and managed ship owner
and operator with a 14-year track record
of successfully operating mid-size bulk
carriers under the UK flag and Tonnage
Tax regime. British Marine was originally
set up in 1999 by CEO Alan Bekhor who
personally invested the funds in its
series of three EIS companies, which
between them purchased seven vessels
from 1999 to 2002. At the time of the
merger of the companies in 2007 the
accumulated cash and fair value of the
vessels showed an IRR of 37% over a
seven year period
83
.
Asset backed EIS, London Shipping Ltd
was also launched in 2014, although
fundraising issues prevented it from
progressing.
TIME Investments has recently
introduced its own Dry Bulk shipping
EIS and is also taking advantage of the
expertise of British Marine. The project
is looking to raise funds through EIS
companies, which will each seek to raise
£5 million in any 12 month period. This
should generate sufficient capital to
acquire a vessel outright without the
need for gearing.
A three to five-year holding period is
anticipated for each EIS company to
provide adequate time for a recovery in
the shipping market and the targeted
exit is for the acquired vessel(s) to be
sold and the EIS companies liquidated
at that time.
TIME Investments believes that
there is a healthy market for second
hand vessels, citing Eggar Forresters
Shipbrokers November 2015 sales
report of 40 Dry Bulk second hand ships
being sold in that month alone.
TIME Investments is well aware of the
market dynamics and the variances
between vessel types and returns and
has focused on Supramax/Handymax
class ships as its intended acquisition.
This is unsurprising given Scorpio
Bulkers assertion that a feature of
the recent downswing in the freight
market cycle was the relative resilience
of earnings in the Handymax and
Handysize sectors compared with
the larger vessel sizes. This can be
partly attributed to the greater trading
versatility offered by the cargo gear on
these vessel types
84
.
Stephen Daniels, Head of Tax Products
and Partner at TIME is positive about
the company’s Dry Bulk shipping EIS,
asserting that, “With the Baltic Dry
Shipping index hitting a new all-time
low in November 2015 and ship prices
falling to a level where an EIS can
purchase a ship without debt, this is a
great opportunity for investors to enter
a non-contentious sector that few have
previously had access to, whilst taking
advantage of all the tax benefits an EIS
can offer”.
To provide additional guidance on the
shipping industry and specifically dry
bulk operations, the EIS companies will
also appoint an Independent Advisory
Committee comprising experts with
extensive industry experience, with the
aim of achieving between £1.27 and £1.94
for each 70p (£1 net of tax relief) invested.
The EIS fees are not insignificant, but
fairly typical of the EIS market, with a
3% transaction fee on subscription (this
can be up to 5%)
85
, up to 1.75% yearly
services fee and a performance fee of
20% of the proceeds between £1.05
and £1.25 per £1.00 of net subscription,
with all proceeds in excess of £1.25
per £1.00 of net subscription subject
to a 40% performance fee. The second
tier of this performance fee is higher
than is generally the case, but is shared
equally between TIME Investments
and the Asset Manager, and reflects
the specialist and complex nature of
the investments and their ongoing
management. However, unusually and
in order to align the Manager’s interests
with those of the investors, TIME is not
charging an annual management fee.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTS
Taking into account the environmental,
regulatory, operational and economic
challenges which face the Dry
Bulk shipping fleet, the continuing
development of new features, methods,
products and processes to drive
improvement is, in some instances, not
just a promising development, but a
necessity.
These include:
EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
New regulations are currently pushing
development in this area and these
include the Harmonised Common
Structural Rules (HCSR) and International
Maritime Organisation (IMO) Nitrogen
Oxide (NOx) Tier III requirements.
The two main methods of compliance
are exhaust-gas recirculation and
selective catalytic reduction systems,
both of which are still in development
for slow-speed, two-stroke engines.
The technology has to achieve a 76%
improvement on the current Tier II
levels
65
.
Such improvements are likely to prove
costly to existing vessels, although the
Tier III regulations only apply to new
vessels and engines, and potentially
delay delivery of newbuildings.
Nevertheless, according to the DNV
Shipping Report, 2020, they will be
worth it from both an environmental
and cost perspective, “Newbuildings in
2020 will emit from 10% to 35% less CO2
than today’s ships. The largest reduction
will be experienced with tank, bulk and
container vessels. Environmentally
efficient designs will gradually
improve throughout this decade and
a newbuilding contracted in 2020 will,
depending on type, emit 10-35% less
CO2 than a current ship. Between one-
third and one-half of this reduction will
be motivated by cost-efficiency alone
and would be implemented regardless
of the EEDI requirements.”
4
The possible use of different fuels is
already being explored, with a cross-
industry collaboration of partners
about to start research and ultimately
aiming to realise the commercial
and environmental benefits of using
liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a shipping
fuel for deep sea marine transportation.
LNG is the cleanest of the hydrocarbon
marine fuels.
86
Biofuels and hydrogen are also
amongst new methods being looked
“Newbuildings in 2020 will emit from 10% to 35% less CO2 than today’s ships”
DNV Shipping Report 2020




