As promised, here are the full results of the polls we held at the AMPS 2013 conference.

In your opinion, what is the appropriate allocation to alternatives (for a well diversified portfolio of approx. £100K for a 50 year old man?

  • Less than 10% (42% of the votes)
  • 10-20% (48% of the votes)
  • More than 20% (5% of the votes)
  • No allocation to alternatives (5% of the votes)

How should alternative investments be regulated?

  • CP12/19 (17% of the votes)
  • “Invest-Aware” kite mark and self regulation (32% of the votes)
  • Primary legislation (41% of the votes)
  • No regulation (11% of the votes)

What is the right way for alternatives to be distributed?

  • Only advised sales (51% of the votes)
  • Advised and execution only (49% of the votes)

What is the right way for alternatives to be distributed?

  • Only high net worth individuals (47% of the votes)
  • Anybody (53% of the votes)

What is the right way for alternatives to be distributed?

  • Only SIPP led (57% of the votes)
  • Product and SIPP led (43% of the votes)

Thanks

Dan

Comments are closed.