As promised, here are the full results of the polls we held at the AMPS 2013 conference.
In your opinion, what is the appropriate allocation to alternatives (for a well diversified portfolio of approx. £100K for a 50 year old man?
- Less than 10% (42% of the votes)
- 10-20% (48% of the votes)
- More than 20% (5% of the votes)
- No allocation to alternatives (5% of the votes)
How should alternative investments be regulated?
- CP12/19 (17% of the votes)
- “Invest-Aware” kite mark and self regulation (32% of the votes)
- Primary legislation (41% of the votes)
- No regulation (11% of the votes)
What is the right way for alternatives to be distributed?
- Only advised sales (51% of the votes)
- Advised and execution only (49% of the votes)
What is the right way for alternatives to be distributed?
- Only high net worth individuals (47% of the votes)
- Anybody (53% of the votes)
What is the right way for alternatives to be distributed?
- Only SIPP led (57% of the votes)
- Product and SIPP led (43% of the votes)
Thanks
Dan